Wasn’t Edelstone a writer for Stereophile back in the Good Old Days? No matter, this wine is pretty big, pretty woody, pretty dark, not very pretty. It comes across as more pretense than reality. I just don’t get it.
SY (6/01)
Wasn’t Edelstone a writer for Stereophile back in the Good Old Days? No matter, this wine is pretty big, pretty woody, pretty dark, not very pretty. It comes across as more pretense than reality. I just don’t get it.
SY (6/01)
Australia ($11): Decent fruit nose with a waxy edge. The palate is austere but there is some depth to the fruit. Short finish. An adequate bbq wine that may benefit from a year or so in the bottle.
JD (3/99)
Australia ($24): Not your typical Aussie shiraz. Missing is the ripe jammy fruit and the spicy coconut aromas of America oak. What is in its place is a restrained nose of blueberries, raspberries and a touch of mint. The fruit is there on the palate but is held in check by a tight structure. Although it’s already six years old, methinks that another five years of cellaring will be greatly rewarded.
JD (4/99)
Australia ($31): Heavy toast on the nose with big candied fruit on the palate. The finish falls off fast. A rare misstep from Penfolds.
JD (7/99)
Australia ($48): Deep, deep color. Black fruit and eucalyptus on the nose with plenty of spicy American oak. Blackberry and black cherry fruit on the palate with big tannins. A full bodied wine that needs years.
JD (7/99)